Appeal No. 2006-1084
Reexamination Control No. 90/006,334
1 References relied on by the Examiner
2 Abraham US 5,983,270 Nov. 9, 1999
3 Cirasole US 5,987,606 Nov. 16, 1999
4 Engel US 5,124,984 Jun. 23, 1992
5 Shwed EP 658,837 A2 Jun. 21 1995
6
7 Steven W. Lodin & Christoph L. Schuba, Firewalls Fend off Invasions From
7 the Net, IEEE SPECTRUM, Feb. 1998, at 26-34.
8
9
Lincoln D. Stein, Web Security: A Step-By-Step Reference Guide 387
10 (Addison-Wesley 1998) (1960).
11
12
W. Richard Stevens, TCP/IP Illustrated: The Protocols 1-12, 29-30, 143-
13 150 (Addison-Wesley 1994).
14
15
16 The Rejections on Appeal
17 The Examiner rejected claims 15-18 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second
18 paragraph, as being indefinite.
19 The Examiner rejected claims 1, 4-12, and 14-15 under 35 U.S.C.
20 § 102(e) as being anticipated by Abraham.
21 The Examiner rejected claims 1, 4, 9 and 15 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e)
22 as being anticipated by Cirasole.
23 The Examiner rejected claims 1-9, and 11-18 under 35 U.S.C.
24 § 102(b) as being anticipated by Engel.
25 The Examiner rejected claim 10 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
26 unpatentable over Engle and Shwed.
27 The Examiner rejected claims 2, 3 and 13 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
28 being unpatentable over Abraham and Lodin.
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013