The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication in and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
___________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
___________
Ex parte JOHN K. ECKL
___________
Appeal No. 2006-1650
Application No. 09/903,500
Technology Center 3600
___________
Decided: March 29, 2007
___________
Before WILLIAM F. PATE, JENNIFER D. BAHR, and ANTON W. FETTING,
Administrative Patent Judges.
WILLIAM F. PATE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
PRELIMINARY MATTERS
A party, such as Appellant, dissatisfied with a Decision of the Board in an ex
parte appeal of an application has two courses of action. The party may request
rehearing (reconsideration) under 37 C.F.R. § 41.52, or the party may seek judicial
review by appeal or civil action. See 37 C.F.R. § 1.197(b) and 37 C.F.R. §
1.304(a)(1). The ex parte patent regulations and the jurisprudence do not provide
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013