1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
2 for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board
3
4 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
5 ____________________
6
7 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
8 AND INTERFERENCES
9 ____________________
10
11 Ex parte JEFFREY M. LEIDEN, OMAR S. KHALIL, ERIC BRIAN
12 SHAIN, STANISLAW KANTOR, SHU-JEN YEH, JAMES J. KOZIARZ,
13 CHARLES F. HANNA, XIAOMAO WU, and RONALD R. HOHS
14 ____________________
15
16 Appeal 2006-1971
17 Application 10/144,224
18 Technology Center 3700
19 ____________________
20
21 Decided: March 27, 2007
22 ____________________
23
24 Before: TERRY J. OWENS, STUART S. LEVY, and
25 ANTON W. FETTING, Administrative Patent Judges.
26
27 LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge.
28
29
30
31 DECISION ON APPEAL
32
33 STATEMENT OF CASE
34 Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 (2002) from a final rejection
35 of claims 1, 3-10, 12-17, 19, and 20. Claims 2, 11, and 18 have been
36 cancelled (Br. 3). We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) (2002).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013