onecle

Ex Parte Miller - Page 1





               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                           
                     for publication in and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  

                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                      
                                          ___________                                                               
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                        
                                     AND INTERFERENCES                                                              
                                          ___________                                                               
                                  Ex parte GROVER L. MILLER                                                         
                                          ___________                                                               
                                      Appeal No. 2006-1996                                                          
                                    Application No. 10/459,679                                                      
                                     Technology Center 3600                                                         
                                          ___________                                                               
                                     Decided: March 29, 2007                                                        
                                          ___________                                                               
           Before WILLIAM F. PATE, TERRY J. OWENS and, ANTON W. FETTING                                             
           Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                            
           WILLIAM F. PATE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                            


                                     DECISION ON APPEAL                                                             
                                  STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                             
                 This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-9 and 16.  Claims 10-                       
           15 stand withdrawn from consideration as directed to a non-elected invention.                            
           Claim 17 has been cancelled.                                                                             













Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013