Ex Parte Miller - Page 2

           Appeal Number: 2006-1996                                                                                 
           Application Number: 10/459,679                                                                           

                 The claimed subject matter is directed to a drawer for a desk.  The drawer is                      
           sized so that a laptop computer and an auxiliary keyboard can be placed therein. In                      
           the rear of the drawer are electrical and data connections for the laptop computer.                      
                 Claim 1, reproduced below, is further illustrative of the claimed subject                          
           matter.                                                                                                  
                 1.  An article of furniture, comprising:                                                           
                 a furniture housing; and                                                                           
                 a drawer slidably mounted within said furniture housing, said drawer having                        
           a front portion and a rear portion and defining a storage area dimensioned to                            
           support at least a laptop computer and an auxiliary computer keyboard; and                               
                 said drawer rear portion including a power and data module, said power and                         
           data module having an AC power outlet and at least one of a phone and a data                             
           outlet.                                                                                                  
              The references of record relied upon by the examiner as evidence of                                   
           anticipation and obviousness are:                                                                        
           Randolph                     5,437,235             Aug. 1, 1995                                          
           Lin                    5,704,698              Jan. 6, 1998                                               
           D’Souza                     6,626,686             Sep. 30, 2003                                         

              Claims 1, 7 and 8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as anticipated by                              
           Randolph.                                                                                                
              Claims 1-3 and 6-8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as anticipated by                             
           D’Souza.                                                                                                 
              Claims 9 and 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over                                  
           Randolph.                                                                                                
              Claims 4 and 5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over                              
           D’Souza over Lin.                                                                                        


                                                2                                                                   









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013