Ex Parte Snow - Page 3



           Appeal No. 2006-2057                                                                     
           Application No. 10/277,482                                                               

                       A dealer dealing additional cards to each player hand, a total number        
              of cards held by each player and the dealer when combined with the previously         
              dealt cards not to exceed six to participate in a second game against the dealer,     
              wherein the second game is selected from the group consisting of blackjack;           
                       Resolving the second wager using standard rules of the selected              
              second game;                                                                          
                       A player placing a third wager on a third game segment;                      
                       A dealer dealing each player additional cards, if any, so that all           
              players hold six cards;                                                               
                       Resolving the third wager by comparing each player’s hand to a pay           
              table;                                                                                
                       Awarding a payout to the players holding predetermined winning               
              hands according to the pay table, wherein the third game segment is selected          
              from the group consisting of poker and gin rummy;                                     
                       A player placing fourth wager on a bonus game segment; and                   
                       Resolving the fourth wager by paying the player a payout for at least        
              two wins or pushes on consecutively played game segments.                             
                 The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting        
           the appealed claims are:                                                                 
           Ornstein    5,718,431   Feb. 17, 1998                                                    
           Awada (‘550)    5,921,550   Jul.   13, 1999                                              
           de Keller    5,975,529   Nov.   2, 1999                                                  
           Awada (‘643)   5,988,643   Nov. 23, 1999                                                 
                 Claims 1-30 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable          
           over Awada ('643) in view of Ornstein.                                                   
                                                 3                                                  



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013