onecle

Ex Parte Saranditis - Page 1



                    The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                                      
                               for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                           

                             UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                              
                                                        ____________                                                                
                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                               
                                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                                                 
                                                        ____________                                                                
                                           Ex parte NIKOLAOS SARANDITIS                                                             
                                                        ____________                                                                
                                                      Appeal 2006-2171                                                              
                                                   Application 10/840,715                                                           
                                                  Technology Center 3600                                                            
                                                        ____________                                                                
                                                  Decided: March 27, 2007                                                           
                                                        ____________                                                                
                   Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, PETER F. KRATZ, and                                                                    
                   CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                 
                   GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                             

                                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                
                           This appeal involves claims 1-5, 8, 10-18, 25, 26, 31 and 34-36.  We                                     
                   have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C.  6(b) and 134.                                         
                           We AFFIRM.                                                                                               









Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013