Ex Parte Ackerman et al - Page 1

                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                   
                          for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          
                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                               Ex parte JOHN FREDERICK ACKERMAN,                                              
                            VENKAT SUBRAMANIAN VENKATARAMANI,                                                 
                                           IRENE T. SPITSBERG,                                                
                               BRETT ALLEN ROHRER BOUTWELL and                                                
                                         RAMGOPAL DAROLIA                                                     
                                             Appeal 2006-2179                                                 
                                           Application 10/735,369                                             
                                          Technology Center 1700                                              
                                         Decided:  January 11, 2007                                           

                Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, CHUNG K. PAK, and                                                   
                LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                              
                PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                             

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                      This is a decision on an appeal from the Examiner's final rejection of                  
                claims 1 through 20 which are all of the claims pending in the above-                         
                identified application.  We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C.  134.                    

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013