Ex Parte Ridgway - Page 1



                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                               
                                     is not binding precedent of the Board.                                        

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                 
                                                 ____________                                                      
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                  
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                       
                                                 ____________                                                      
                                      Ex parte HELEN JANE RIDGWAY                                                  
                                                 ____________                                                      
                                               Appeal 2006-2372                                                    
                                            Application 10/854,708                                                 
                                            Technology Center 1700                                                 
                                                 ____________                                                      
                                         Decided: September 11, 2007                                               
                                                 ____________                                                      


                Before DONALD E. ADAMS, DEMETRA J. MILLS, and ERIC GRIMES,                                         
                Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                      
                ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                

                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                      
                       This appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 involves claims 1-3 and 6-21, the                         
                only claims pending in this application.  We have jurisdiction under 35                            
                U.S.C.  6(b).                                                                                     
                                               INTRODUCTION                                                        
                       The claims are directed to a method for measuring platelet function.                        
                Claims 1 and 6 are illustrative:                                                                   




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013