Ex Parte Cheng - Page 11

               Appeal 2006-2453                                                                             
               Application 10/302,391                                                                       
                      level of knowledge in November 2002 of one of ordinary skill in the                   
                      art of filtration modules.                                                            
               23) According to Dr. Cheng,                                                                  
                            polyurethane adhesives are a different type of                                  
                            adhesive. Polyurethanes are formed through the                                  
                            reaction of an isocyanate component with amines,                                
                            polyols, or other active hydrogen compounds,                                    
                            Polyurethane adhesives require a catalyst, heat or                              
                            air evaporation to initiate complete curing. Thus,                              
                            polyurethane adhesives are different in                                         
                            composition and property from UV curable                                        
                            adhesives.  [Cheng Declaration, ¶ 8.]                                           



                                             PRINCIPLES OF LAW                                              
               1)     Anticipation under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) requires that "each and every                   
                      element as set forth in the claim is found, either expressly or                       
                      inherently described, in a single prior art reference."  In re Robertson,             
                      169 F.3d 743, 745, 49 USPQ2d 1949, 1950 (Fed. Cir. 1999).                             
               2)     The Examiner bears the initial burden of establishing a prima facie                   
                      case of anticipation. In re King, 801 F.2d 1324, 1326-27, 231 USPQ                    
                      136, 138 (Fed. Cir. 1986).                                                            
               3)     A determination that a claim is anticipated involves two analytical                   
                      steps.  First, the Board must interpret the claim language, where                     
                      necessary.  Second, the Board must compare the construed claims to a                  
                      prior art reference to determine whether each and every limitation is                 
                      found either expressly or inherently in that reference.  In re Crish, 393             
                      F.3d 1253, 1256, 73 USPQ2d 1364, 1366-67 (Fed. Cir. 2004).                            


                                                    11                                                      

Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013