Appeal 2006-2453
Application 10/302,391
adhesive. We find Dr. Cheng’s declaration persuasive in distinguishing the
claimed UV cured adhesive from the prior art adhesives. The rejection of
claims 6-9 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as anticipated by or, in the alternative,
under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over, Bray is reversed.
REVERSED
hh
STINSON MORRISON HECKER LLP
ATTN: PATENT GROUP
1201 WALNUT STREET, SUITE 2800
KANSAS CITY, MO 64106-2150
16
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Last modified: September 9, 2013