The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOHN C. COLVIN,
CHARLES VIGNAL,
PHILIPPE EDOUARD TISSOT, and
LARRY RAYMOND CROWE
____________
Appeal 2006-2589
Application 10/618,499
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: August 22, 2007
____________
Before THOMAS A. WALTZ, CATHERINE Q. TIMM, and
JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Statement of the Case
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection
of claims 1-15, 17-34, 37-39, and 41. We have jurisdiction under
35 U.S.C. § 6.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013