Appeal 2006-2589
Application 10/618,499
§ 103(a) as obvious over the combined teachings of Diehr and
Mente is affirmed. As a final point with respect to the § 103
rejections, we note that Appellants base no argument upon objective
evidence of nonobviousness, such as unexpected results.
ORDER
The rejection of claims 1-15, 17-34, 37-39, and 41 under
35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph is reversed. The rejection of claims
1-15, 17-34, 37-39, and 41 under 35 USC §103 (a) is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection
with this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
AFFIRMED
tf/ls
Wong, Cabello, Lutsch, Rutherford
& Brucculeri, L.L.P.
20333 SH 249
Suite 600
Houston, TX 77070
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Last modified: September 9, 2013