Ex Parte Yang et al - Page 5

                 Appeal No. 2006-2654                                                                                                   
                 Application No. 10/100,276                                                                                             

                 liquids or fluid” or “a groove or furrow.”2  In preferred embodiments, the                                             
                 application describes channels “formed by traditional photolithography                                                 
                 method by HF etching.  The channels are etched to a depth of about 18 µm.”                                             
                 Specification [0014].  Giving the claim term “channel” its broadest                                                    
                 reasonable interpretation in view of the specification, we interpret “channel”                                         
                 to be a structural feature of the apparatus, such as a groove, furrow, or other                                        
                 passageway through which fluid can travel.  The apparatus comprises at                                                 
                 least two channels (a “first” and a “second” channel).                                                                 
                        The first and second channels of the apparatus are characterized in a                                           
                 “wherein” clause of claim 1 as “separated over at least part of their length by                                        
                 a wall defining a dam and over which fluid may flow from the first of said                                             
                 channels into the second of said two channels.”  We interpret the “wall                                                
                 defining a dam” to be a part of the claimed apparatus because it is set forth                                          
                 in the claim as a limitation of the channels, which are themselves integral to                                         
                 the apparatus.  This interpretation is consistent with the specification which                                         
                 describes a preferred embodiment in which the “dam walls” separate the two                                             
                 channels.  Specification [0016].  Two side-by-side and parallel channels are                                           
                 etched into a quartz plate producing a structural wall between them which                                              
                 serves as a “dam wall.”  Id. at [0014].                                                                                
                        In sum, we interpret claim 1 to be directed to an apparatus which                                               
                 comprises at least two integral channels formed from the apparatus surface.                                            
                 The channels are separated by a dam wall along at least part of their length.                                          
                 The dam wall is a structural part of the apparatus.                                                                    

                                                                                                                                       
                 2 The Random House Dictionary 224 (1982).                                                                              

                                                         5                                                                              









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013