onecle

Ex Parte Brennan - Page 1



                        The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                         
                                  is not binding precedent of the Board.                                   

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                           
                                           ________________                                                
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                            
                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                           ________________                                                
                                Ex parte JONATHAN PAUL BRENNAN                                             
                                           ________________                                                
                                            Appeal 2006-2708                                               
                                         Application 09/824,454                                            
                                         Technology Center 1700                                            
                                           ________________                                                
                                         Decided:  July 30, 2007                                           
                                           ________________                                                
               Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and                                               
               CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                            
               KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                        

                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                      This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-5 and 8.  Claim 1             
               is illustrative:                                                                            
               1. A multi-layer nonwoven web suitable for use as a wet wipe, the web                       
                      comprising:                                                                          
                      (a) a first carded fibrous outer layer comprising from about 10% to                  
                            about 60% conjugate fiber, from about 20% to about 65%                         
                            cellulosic fibers;                                                             
                                                                                                          



Page:  1  2  3  4  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013