Ex Parte Brennan - Page 2



               Appeal 2006-2708                                                                            
               Application 09/824,454                                                                      

                      (b) a fibrous inner layer comprising from about 10% to about 60%                     
                            conjugate fiber, from about 10% to about 90% cellulosic fibers,                
                            said inner layer bonded at discrete bond sites to said first outer             
                            layer in a face to face relationship; and                                      
                      (c) a second carded fibrous outer layer comprising from about 10%                    
                            to about 60% conjugate fiber, from about 20% to about 65%                      
                            cellulosic fibers, said second fibrous outer layer bonded at                   
                            discrete bond sites to said inner layer in a face to face                      
                            relationship.                                                                  
                      The Examiner relies upon the following reference in the rejection of                 
               the appealed claims:                                                                        
               Cohen  US 5,505,719 Apr. 9, 1996                                                            
                      Appellant’s claimed invention is directed to a multi-layer nonwoven                  
               web that is suitable for use as a wet wipe comprising a fibrous inner layer                 
               that is bonded to first and second outer layers in a face-to-face relationship.             
                      Appealed claims 1, 2, and 8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)                  
               as being anticipated by Cohen.  Claims 3-5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                   
               § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Cohen.                                                  
                      We have thoroughly reviewed the respective positions advanced by                     
               Appellant and the Examiner.  In so doing, we concur with Appellant that the                 
               Examiner has failed to make out a prima facie case of anticipation or                       
               obviousness for the claimed subject matter.  Accordingly, we will not sustain               
               the Examiner’s rejections.                                                                  
                      The fatal flaw in the Examiner’s rejections is that Cohen fails to                   
               describe an inner layer that is bonded in a face-to-face relationship with two              
               outer layers.  Indeed, no one inner layer of Cohen is bonded to both of the                 
                                                    2                                                      



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013