onecle

Ex Parte Lagasse - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                
                         for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                        

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                           
                                              ____________                                                 
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                            
                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                              ____________                                                 
                                      Ex parte ROLAND LAGASSE                                              
                                              ____________                                                 
                                            Appeal 2006-2711                                               
                                         Application 10/662,935                                            
                                         Technology Center 3700                                            
                                              ____________                                                 
                                        Decided: March 22, 2007                                            
                                              ____________                                                 


               Before WILLIAM F. PATE, III, MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, and                                       
               JENNIFER D. BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                             
               BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          

                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 

                                      STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                
                      Roland Lagasse (Appellant) appeals under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the                    
               Examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1-6, 8-10, 12-14, and 16.  Claims 7, 11,               
               and 15 have been canceled .  We have jurisdiction over this appeal under                    
               35 U.S.C.  6.                                                                              




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013