The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ROLAND LAGASSE
____________
Appeal 2006-2711
Application 10/662,935
Technology Center 3700
____________
Decided: March 22, 2007
____________
Before WILLIAM F. PATE, III, MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, and
JENNIFER D. BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Roland Lagasse (Appellant) appeals under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
Examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1-6, 8-10, 12-14, and 16. Claims 7, 11,
and 15 have been canceled . We have jurisdiction over this appeal under
35 U.S.C. § 6.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013