Ex Parte Birk et al - Page 9

               Appeal 2006-2786                                                                             
               Application 10/240,329                                                                       

               sensed by the optical sensing means, the control means operating the flow                    
               directing device to terminate the flow of milk into the branch line and to                   
               direct milk to flow through the main milk line in response to the                            
               predetermined change in the milk transparency being detected” (claim 9)                      
               (Br. 9), and (2) “a control device provided to receive the signal produced by                
               the transparency sensing means and detect a predetermined change in the                      
               transparency sensed by the transparency sensing means whereby the                            
               transparency falls initially and then rises at the beginning of milk extraction              
               during the main milking stage, and wherein a means controlled by the                         
               control device is provided to interrupt delivery of milk to the container in                 
               response to the predetermined change in transparency detected by the                         
               control device”2 (claim 19) (Br. 9).                                                         
                      As we previously indicated in our discussion of claims 1 and 5,                       
               Petterson discloses a control unit 14 which receives signals from sensing                    
               means 36 and uses those signals to control the three-way valve 37 to either                  
               direct the foremilk into the waste tank 22 or milk tank 20 (Petterson 6, l. 14               
               to 7, l. 10).  Thus, Petterson discloses “control means [i.e., control unit 14]              
               operating the flow directing device [i.e., three-way valve 37] to terminate the              

                                                                                                           
               2 Neither Appellants nor the Examiner has expressly interpreted the “means-                  
               plus-function” language of these claims.  In any event, when properly                        
               interpreted, the here claimed “means” encompasses the structure of                           
               Petterson.  For example, Petterson’s “three-way valve” is the same as                        
               Appellants’ “means” for interrupting delivery of milk as recited in claim 19                 
               with the corresponding structure (i.e., a three-way valve) for such “means-                  
               plus-function” language recited in claim 21 (which ultimately depends on                     
               claim 19) and disclosed on page 6, lines 12-19 of the Specification.  In re                  
               Donaldson, 16 F.3d 1189, 1195, 29 USPQ2d 1845, 1850 (Fed. Cir. 1994)                         
               (en banc).                                                                                   
                                                     9                                                      

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013