The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte LIGIA A. RIVERA, JOE CWIAKALA,
JOHN EUGENE PELUSO, LEE DEMENY,
KAREN LEE DEMENY, WILLIAM ROBERT NEWMAN,
YUNG HSIANG HSANG, MICHAEL JOHN FAULKS,
STEVEN JOHN ROMME and GERALD P. DEGREEN
____________
Appeal 2006-2867
Application 10/771,969
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: March 13, 2007
____________
Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and
JEFFERY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the Primary Examiner’s refusal to
allow claims 81 through 87, 90 through 98, and 111 through 122, as
amended subsequent to the final rejection (see the Amendment dated Oct.
25, 2005, entered as per the Advisory Action dated Nov. 7, 2005). Claims
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013