Ex Parte Rivera et al - Page 2

               Appeal 2006-2867                                                                            
               Application 10/771,969                                                                      

               88, 89, 99, and 100 are the only other claims pending in this application.                  
               These claims have been objected to by the Examiner as depending on a                        
               rejected claim but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form,                     
               including all the limitations of the base claim (Br. 2).  We have jurisdiction              
               pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134.                                                         
                      According to Appellants, the invention is directed to a roll of wet                  
               wipes comprising a wetting composition with at least about 1 weight percent                 
               of inorganic salt (Br. 3).  Further details of the invention may be gleaned                 
               from representative independent claim 81 as reproduced below:                               
                      81. A roll of wet wipes, comprising:                                                 
                      a roll having at least 300 linear inches of wet wipes, the wet wipes                 
               having a width of not more than about 4.5 inches; and                                       
                                                                                                          
                      a wetting composition comprising at least about 1 weight percent of                  
               inorganic salt, based on the weight of the wetting composition;                             
                      wherein the wet wipes are in a spiral; and                                           
                      the diameter of the roll is at least about 2 inches and no greater than              
               about 5.5 inches.                                                                           

                      In addition to the admitted prior art (hereafter the APA) and co-                    
               pending Application No. 10/664,342, the Examiner has relied on the                          
               following references as evidence of unpatentability:                                        
               Gordon                                 US 5,763,332                           Jun. 09, 1998 
               Nissing                                 US 6,623,834 B1                     Sep. 23, 2003   





                                                    2                                                      

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013