Ex Parte Engl et al - Page 1



              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written     
                      for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.             

                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                
                                        ____________                                         
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                  
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                         
                                        ____________                                         
                          Ex parte BERNHARD ENGL, DIETER SENK,                               
                  JOHANN WILHELM SCHMITZ and ANDREAS OFFERGELD                               
                                        ____________                                         
                                      Appeal 2006-2882                                       
                                    Application 10/433,729                                   
                                   Technology Center 3700                                    
                                        ____________                                         
                                  Decided:  February 28, 2007                                
                                        ____________                                         

             Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, CHUNG K. PAK, and                                     
             JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.                                 
             GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                            

                                   DECISION ON APPEAL                                        
                   This appeal involves claims 12-25, the only claims pending in this        
             application.  We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C.        
              134.                                                                          
                   We AFFIRM.                                                                






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013