Ex Parte Engl et al - Page 2

                Appeal 2006-2882                                                                                   
                Application 10/433,729                                                                             
                                               INTRODUCTION                                                        
                       Appellants invented a method for producing a steel hot strip having a                       
                manganese content of more than 12 and up to 30 weight percent comprising                           
                the following steps:  (1) forming a roughed strip by casting a melt in a                           
                double-roller casting machine, and (2) immediately after casting and without                       
                reheating the roughed strip, hot-rolling the roughed strip in a single hot roll                    
                pass through the a roll stand to the final thickness of the strip (Specification                   
                1-2).  By hot rolling immediately after casting, Appellants avoid reheating                        
                the roughed strip that is required by conventional methods (Specification 3).                      
                Claim 12 is illustrative:                                                                          
                       12.  A method for producing a steel hot strip with TWIP and TRIP                            
                characteristics from a steel which comprises more than 12 weight % and up                          
                to 30 weight % of manganese, comprising                                                            
                       casting a melt in a double-roller casting machine so as to form                             
                a roughed strip at close to the final dimensions of said hot strip, said roughed                   
                strip having a thickness of up to 6 mm,                                                            
                       immediately after said casting step and without reheating said                              
                roughed strip, continuously processing said roughed strip by being hot rolled                      
                in a roll stand in a single hot roll pass to the final thickness of the hot strip.                 
                       The Examiner relies on the following prior art references as evidence                       
                of unpatentability:                                                                                
                Suzuki (as translated) JP 57-025950 Aug. 27, 1983                                                  
                Guelton US 6,358,338 B1 Mar. 19, 2002                                                              
                       The rejections as presented by the Examiner are as follows:                                 
                    1. Claims 12-14 and 18-25 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as                             
                       unpatentable over Guelton.                                                                  
                    2. Claims 15-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable                          
                       over Guelton in view of Suzuki.                                                             


                                                        2                                                          

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013