onecle

Ex Parte Sherman et al - Page 1



                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                      
                           for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                             

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                
                                                 ____________                                                     
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                  
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                      
                                                 ____________                                                     
                       Ex parte JEFFREY H. SHERMAN and RICHARD T. TAYLOR                                          
                                                 ____________                                                     
                                               Appeal 2006-2994                                                   
                                            Application 09/753,495                                                
                                            Technology Center 1700                                                
                                                 ____________                                                     
                                           Decided:  January 5, 2007                                              
                                                 ____________                                                     

                Before CHUNG K. PAK, CATHERINE Q. TIMM, and                                                       
                LINDA M. GAUDETTE,  Administrative Patent Judges.                                                 

                GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                            

                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                     
                       This appeal involves claims 4, 6-9, 11-13, 16-22, 25-28, 31, 32, 34-36                     
                and 39-42, the only claims pending in this application.  We have jurisdiction                     
                over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C.  134.                                                      








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013