Appeal 2006-3252
Application 09/536,728
1 G. Conclusions of law
2 Esser has sustained its burden on appeal of showing that the Examiner
3 erred in rejecting Esser claims 73-75, 77-79 and 81 as being unpatentable
4 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over Stähle.
5 On the record before us, Esser is not entitled to a patent containing
6 Esser claims 26 and 73-81.
7 Esser claims 26 and 73-81 are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103
8 over Olson.
9 Esser claims 73-81 are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over York.
10 Esser claims 74-76 and 79-80 are unpatentable under the fourth
11 paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112.
12
33
Page: Previous 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013