Ex Parte Dudek et al - Page 5

            Appeal Number: 2006-3321                                                                          
            Application Number: 09/843,381                                                                    

                   therein a diverter, said diverter being such that the difference between                   
                   the diameter of the diverter and that of the surrounding chamber is                        
                   such that the cross-sectional area therebetween gradually increases in                     
                   the direction of flow of the filling head component; and                                   
                   (ii) a component located in a fill aperture of a container, said                           
                   components being engageable with one another so as to provide a                            
                   direct path from said filling head to the interior of the container.                       

                Claim 1 of the ‘880 patent is:                                                                
                   1. A system for the mixing of one or more concentrates to form a                           
                   product, comprising a vending machine, said vending machine                                
                   comprising one or more diluent sources and one or more concentrate                         
                   sources, said diluent and concentrate sources being in fluid                               
                   communication with one or more mixing chambers, the mixing                                 
                   chamber being adapted to mix the diluent and concentrate sources                           
                   prior to dispense, the product being selected from cleaning products                       
                   and detergents, the vending machine further comprising one or more                         
                   dispense points adapted to dispense the product into a storage                             
                   container when the storage container is positioned for dispensing from                     
                   the vending machine.                                                                       

                The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created                  
            doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to                   
            prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the "right to exclude"                  
            granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A                   
            nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting rejection is appropriate where the                 
            conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is              
            not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined                          
            application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the                  
            reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed.                    
            Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re                   
                                                      5                                                       


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013