Ex Parte Dudek et al - Page 8

            Appeal Number: 2006-3321                                                                          
            Application Number: 09/843,381                                                                    

            may result from a given set of circumstances is not sufficient.' " In re Robertson,               
            169 F.3d 743, 745, 49 USPQ2d 1949, 1950-51 (Fed. Cir. 1999) (citations omitted)                   
                There is nothing in Seo to indicate its buttons or water supplies necessarily                 
            prepare customisable consumer products according to available selections made by                  
            a consumer of one or more components of those consumer products having product                    
            characteristics chosen by the consumer.  Accordingly we do not sustain the                        
            examiner's rejection of claims 1, 2, 3, 6, 14 and 16 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as                  
            anticipated by Seo.                                                                               
              Claims 1-10 rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Seo and Partyka.                  
                There is no controversy over whether Partyka makes up for Seo’s deficiencies                  
            in the independent claims.  The dependent claim rejections cannot be sustained                    
            where they fully incorporate the subject matter of the independent claims                         
            improperly rejected over the same art.  Accordingly we do not sustain the                         
            examiner's rejection of claims 1-10 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Seo                  
            and Partyka.                                                                                      
              Claims 6-8 and 11-18 rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Seo and                  
                                                 Whigham.                                                     
                There is no controversy over whether Whigham makes up for Seo’s                               
            deficiencies in the independent claims.  The dependent claim rejections cannot be                 
            sustained where they fully incorporate the subject matter of the independent claims               
            improperly rejected over the same art.  Accordingly we do not sustain the                         
            examiner's rejection of claims 6-8 and 11-18 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious                  
            over Seo and Whigham.                                                                             



                                                      8                                                       


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013