Ex Parte Inoue et al - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                  
                         for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                                Ex parte AKIHISA INOUE, WEI ZHANG,                                           
                                             and TAO ZHANG                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-2658                                                
                                          Application 10/451,143                                             
                                          Technology Center 1700                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                       Decided: September 18, 2007                                           
                                               ____________                                                  
                Before CHUNG K. PAK, CATHERINE Q. TIMM, and                                                  
                LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                             
                PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                            

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the                         
                Examiner's final rejection of claims 2, and 6 through 8.  Claim 4, the other                 
                claim pending in the above-identified application, stands withdrawn from                     
                consideration by the Examiner as being directed to a non-elected invention.                  
                We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6.                                              





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013