Ex Parte Trigger - Page 1



                       The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was                            
                                    is not binding precedent of the Board.                                       

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                
                                                ____________                                                     
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                 
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                     
                                                ____________                                                     
                                      Ex parte VERNON A. TRIGGER                                                 
                                                ____________                                                     
                                              Appeal 2007-0003                                                   
                                            Application 10/217,990                                               
                                           Technology Center 1700                                                
                                                ____________                                                     
                                            Decided: July 27, 2007                                               
                                                ____________                                                     

                Before CHARLES F. WARREN, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, and                                              
                LINDA M. GAUDETTE Administrative Patent Judges.                                                  
                SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                              

                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                    
                                             Statement of the Case                                               
                       This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from a final rejection of                         
                claims 1 to 18.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.  6.                                       
                       Appellant’s invention relate to a transition unit.  According to                          
                Appellant, the transition unit has applications for rendering fluids and gases                   





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013