The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte BENEDICT F. CRAMER, III
__________
Appeal No. 2007-0048
Application No. 10/234,608
Technology Center 3600
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before LORIN, SPIEGEL and LANE, Administrative Patent Judges.
LORIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims
1-12, all the claims pending in the application.1
Appellant (Brief, p. 2) acknowledges that, for purposes of this appeal,
claims 1-10 stand or fall together and claims 11 and 12 stand or fall together.
1 Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6(b), we review the adverse decision of the examiner. In doing so, we
have considered the record, including:
• Final Rejection (December 29, 2003)
• Amendment After Final Rejection (February 21, 2004);
• Advisory Action (March 22, 2004);
• Brief (May 19, 2004);
• Examiner's Answer (“Answer,” August 9, 2004); and,
• Reply Brief (September 3, 2004).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013