Ex Parte Gathman et al - Page 5

            Appeal Number: 2007-0126                                                                         
            Application Number: 09/970,910                                                                   

                The examiner responds that the claim limitation “exchanging” is sufficiently                 
            broad to encompass selling.  (Answer 6.)  We presume the examiner means that the                 
            claim does not specify what the tickets are exchanged for, and therefore may be                  
            exchanged for cash, i.e. a sale.  We agree that the claim is sufficiently broad to               
            encompass this construction in that the specification states that “tickets may be                
            exchanged for consideration other than other electronic tickets, including money                 
            . . .” (Spec 8). Therefore, we find the appellants’ arguments to be unpersuasive.                
                The appellants argue that Nakfoor does not allow exchange after the event                    
            starts, as their invention does.                                                                 
                   Furthermore, unlike the Nakfoor method, the method of the present                         
                   invention is capable of operating after the ticketed event has begun.                     
                   For example, the specification of the patent application states "The                      
                   facility operator may use the access points to communicate                                
                   information to the virtual ticket devices about available seating                         
                   upgrades. These could be based on the real time location of the                           
                   customer. For example, an access point may transmit to the virtual                        
                   ticket device the message: 'Two seats are available in the section in                     
                   front of you. Would you like to move there for an additional $10?'"                       
                   (Specification, Page l6, Lines 10-16).                                                    
                   The Nakfoor method ceases to operate after the ticket buyer enters the                    
                   event.                                                                                    
                   (Br. 9).                                                                                  
                This argument fails to address any limitation in this claim.  We note that there             
            is no temporal attribute within the claim limitation that narrows the time span                  
            during which such patrons must be associated with a public-facility, nor is there                
            any spatial attribute requiring such patrons to be within a public-facility.  By way             
            of analogy, we note that many public television patrons never set foot in a public               
            television station or appear on public television.  We note, in particular, that the             
            very act of obtaining tickets for a public-facility venue is sufficient to characterize          

                                                      5                                                      

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013