onecle

Ex Parte Trajkovic et al - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                   
                          for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          
                                               ____________                                                   
                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                               ____________                                                   
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                               ____________                                                   
                                    Ex parte MIROSLAV TRAJKOVIC,                                              
                                         VASANTH PHILOMIN,                                                    
                                          and SRINIVAS GUTTA                                                  
                                               ____________                                                   
                                             Appeal 2007-0145                                                 
                                          Application 10/183,7971                                             
                                          Technology Center 2100                                              
                                               ____________                                                   
                                          Decided: April 12, 2007                                             
                                               ____________                                                   

                Before LEE E. BARRETT, JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO, and                                                
                JOSEPH L. DIXON,  Administrative Patent Judges.                                               
                BARRETT,  Administrative Patent Judge.                                                        

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                      This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134(a) from the final                    
                rejection of claims 1-27.  We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C.  6(b).                 
                      We affirm-in-part.                                                                      

                                                                                                             
                      1  Application for patent filed June 27, 2002, entitled "Active Window                  
                Switcher."                                                                                    



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013