Ex Parte Tickner - Page 1


                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written            
                                 for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                     

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                
                                                 __________                                                     
                            BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                  
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                     
                                                 __________                                                     
                                      Ex parte ANTHONY ROBIN WHITE                                              
                                                 __________                                                     
                                            Appeal No.  2007-0317                                               
                                          Application No.  09/944,932                                           
                                                 __________                                                     
                                      ORDER UNDER 37 CFR § 41.50(d)                                             
                                                 __________                                                     
                Before SCHEINER, ADAMS and GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judges.                                
                ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                             

                                      ORDER UNDER 37 CFR § 41.50(d)                                             

                       This appeal involves plant patent Application No. 09/944,932, filed August               
                31, 2001.  The issue raised in this appeal is whether evidence of foreign sales of              
                the claimed reproducible plant variety may enable an otherwise non-enabled                      
                printed publication disclosing the plant, thereby creating a bar under 35 U.S.C.                
                § 102(b).                                                                                       
                       Claim 1, the only claim on appeal, is reproduced below:                                  
                       1. A new and distinct variety of Euphorbia plant named ‘Charam’ as                       
                          described and illustrated.                                                            










Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013