Ex Parte Tickner - Page 3


                Appeal No.  2007-0317                                                    Page 3                 
                Application No.  09/944,932                                                                     
                       Answer, page 4.  However, there is no evidence whether the sales                         
                       were of the type that would be noticed by those of skill in the art.                     
                       Nor has the other issue raised by the Federal Circuit in Elsner,                         
                       whether the sales would enable one skilled in the art to reproduce                       
                       the claimed plant without undue experimentation, been addressed.                         
                Accordingly, the rejection of record was vacated and the application was                        
                remanded “to the [E]xaminer to determine whether the sales of the claimed plant                 
                (1) were ‘an obscure, solitary occurrence that would go unnoticed by those                      
                skilled in the art’ and (2) would enable one to reproduce the plant without undue               
                experimentation.”  ’05 Decision, page 2.                                                        
                       In response, the Examiner issued a communication to Appellant under                      
                37 CFR § 1.105 requiring Appellant to provide:                                                  
                       a) a copy of any publications or advertisements relating to sales,                       
                       offers for sale, or public distributions of the claimed plant variety                    
                       anywhere in the world if the sale, offer for sale, or public distribution                
                       occurred prior to the filing date of this application;                                   
                       b) any public information available regarding sales, offers for sale,                    
                       or public distributions of the claimed plant variety anywhere in the                     
                       world that occurred prior to the filing date of this application,                        
                       including the date(s) and location(s) as well as information                             
                       pertaining to whether this was an obscure, solitary occurrence that                      
                       would go unnoticed by those skilled in the art;                                          
                       c) any information relating to the accessibility or non-accessibility of                 
                       the claimed plant that one of ordinary skill in the art could have                       
                       derived from the printed PBR document; [and]                                             
                       d) Applicant is also invited to submit any information that would                        
                       indicate that one of ordinary skill in the art would not have known                      
                       how to successfully reproduce the plant.                                                 
                See Paper, mailed March 18, 2005.                                                               
                       In response, Appellant asserted that “[n]o advertising was undertaken                    
                prior to the application date of the application; that “Euphorbia Charam was                    






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013