Ex Parte Fujii et al - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                   
                          for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                               ____________                                                   
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                               ____________                                                   
                              Ex parte KAZUO FUJII, TAKAYUKI KATOK                                            
                                       and HIDESHI TSUKAMOTO                                                  
                                               ____________                                                   
                                             Appeal 2007-0357                                                 
                                          Application 10/180,862                                              
                                          Technology Center 2100                                              
                                               ____________                                                   
                                          Decided: April 19, 2007                                             
                                               ____________                                                   

                Before JAMES D. THOMAS, JOSEPH L. DIXON, and                                                  
                JEAN R. HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                 
                THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                      This appeal involves claims 1 through 20.  We have jurisdiction under                   
                35 U.S.C.  6(b), 134(a).                                                                    








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013