onecle

Ex Parte Schmidt et al - Page 1





        1              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was                         
        2           not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                    
        3                                                                                                     
        4                                                                                                     
        5               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
        6                                     _____________                                                   
        7                                                                                                     
        8                    BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
        9                                AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
       10                                     _____________                                                   
       11                                                                                                     
       12               Ex parte GUENTHER SCHMIDT and GERDA SCHMIDT                                           
       13                                     _____________                                                   
       14                                                                                                     
       15                                  Appeal No. 2007-0359                                               
       16                               Application No. 10/485,356                                            
       17                                 Technology Center 3600                                              
       18                                     ______________                                                  
       19                                                                                                     
       20                                  Decided: June 15, 2007                                             
       21                                    _______________                                                  
       22                                                                                                     
       22 Before WILLIAM F. PATE, III, TERRY J. OWENS, and MURRIEL E.                                         
       23                                                                                                     
       23 CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                             
       24                                                                                                     
       25                                                                                                     
       25 OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                 
       26                                                                                                     
       27                                                                                                     
       28                                                                                                     
       29                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
       30          The Appellants appeal from a rejection of claims 10-12 and 16-18, which are                
       31   all of the pending claims.                                                                        
       32                                    THE INVENTION                                                    
       33          The Appellants claim a method for degassing a vehicle hydraulic brake                      
       34   system, and a master cylinder for use in that method.  Claims 10 and 18 are                       
       35   illustrative:                                                                                     




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013