Ex Parte Pitts et al - Page 1



               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written          
                       for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                  
                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                     
                                          ____________                                             
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                       
                                     AND INTERFERENCES                                             
                                          ____________                                             
                                 Ex parte M. MICHAEL PITTS, JR.                                    
                                    AND RODRIGO V. ROMO                                            
                                          ____________                                             
                                         Appeal 2007-0417                                          
                                      Application 10/796,814                                       
                                     Technology Center 1700                                        
                                          ____________                                             
                                      Decided: May 11, 2007                                        
                                          ____________                                             
              Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, CHUNG K. PAK, and THOMAS A.                                 
              WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                 
              PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                    


                                     DECISION ON APPEAL                                            
                    This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the                 
              Examiner's refusal to allow claims 1 through 3, all of the claims pending in         
              the above-identified application.  We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C.        
               6.                                                                                 






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013