onecle

Ex Parte Kawasaki - Page 1



                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written           
                       for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                    

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                      
                                           ____________                                              
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                        
                                      AND INTERFERENCES                                              
                                           ____________                                              
                                 Ex parte MASAHIRO KAWASAKI                                          
                                           ____________                                              
                                         Appeal 2007-0442                                            
                                       Application 10/470,060                                        
                                      Technology Center 1700                                         
                                           ____________                                              
                                       Decided: May 30, 2007                                         
                                           ____________                                              
              Before CHUNG K. PAK, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and JEFFREY T. SMITH,                            
              Administrative Patent Judges.                                                          
              PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                      



                                      DECISION ON APPEAL                                             
                    This is an appeal from the Examiner's final rejection of claims 3, 5, 6,         
              and 7, all of the claims pending in the above-identified application.  We have         
              jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C.  6 and 134.                                       







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013