Ex Parte Kawasaki - Page 2

              Appeal 2007-0442                                                                       
              Application 10/470,060                                                                 

                    The subject matter on appeal is directed to “a method of forming a               
              thick silicon dioxide film on a silicon substrate” (Specification 1).  The             
              method “comprises repeating steps of depositing a silicon layer on a silicon           
              substrate and then, subjecting the silicon layer to a thermal oxidation                
              treatment to form a silicon dioxide film of a predetermined thickness….”               
              (Specification 3).  This method is said to overcome the problems associated            
              with a typical thick silicon dioxide film forming method (Specification 1-2).          
              Details of the appealed subject matter are recited in representative claim 3           
              reproduced below:                                                                      
                    3.  A method of forming a silicon dioxide film of a predetermined                
              thickness on a silicon substrate, comprising:                                          
                       a deposition step of depositing epitaxial silicon on said silicon             
              substrate or on a silicon dioxide film formed on said silicon substrate by a           
              thermal oxidation treatment to obtain a deposited epitaxial silicon film; and          
                    a thermal oxidation step of oxidizing said deposited epitaxial                   
              silicon film by heat to convert it into a silicon dioxide film,                        
                    wherein said deposition step and said thermal oxidation step are                 
              repeated a plural number of times.                                                     

                    As evidence of unpatentability of the claimed subject matter, the                
              Examiner has relied upon the following references:                                     
              Jacobson   US 3,807,039   Apr. 30, 1974                                                
              Faraone   US 4,604,304   Aug. 5, 1986                                                  
              Corboy, Jr.   US 4,698,316   Oct. 6, 1987                                              
              Arai    US 2001/0001384 A1  May 24, 2001                                               
              Sato    US 6,375,738 B1   Apr. 23, 2002                                                

                                                 2                                                   

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013