Ex Parte Sagnard et al - Page 1



                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                     
                      BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES                                     
                                       Appeal No. 2007-0484                                         
                          Ex parte DOW GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES INC.                                     
                                           (10/037,942),                                            
                                             Appellant.                                             
                                     ENTERED: 9 April 2007                                          
                                     DECISION – Bd. R. 50(a)                                        

           Before LEE, TORCZON, and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges.                          
           TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                    
                                         INTRODUCTION                                               
                 The claimed invention broadly relates to building panels with domains              
           having different compressive strengths.  All but one of the pending claims are           
           rejected as having been obvious in view of the prior art.1  We AFFIRM.                   
                 Claims                                                                             
                 The appellant (Dow) treats all of the rejected claims as standing or falling       
           together except claim 22.2  Claim 1 is representative of the claims on appeal            
           (emphasis added):                                                                        
                       1. A building panel comprising at least two panel domains,                   
                 wherein each panel domain has an essentially homogeneous                           
                 compressive strength and an average compressive strength; wherein                  
                 said panel:                                                                        
                                                                                                   
           1 The exception, claim 18, is the subject of an objection because it depends from        
           rejected claim 16.                                                                       
           2 Appeal Brief (AB) at 4.  The claim language is taken from the claims appendix to       
           the Appeal Brief.                                                                        



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013