Ex Parte Sagnard et al - Page 2



           Appeal No. 2007-0484                                                        2            
                       (a) has at least two panel domains having different average                  
                                compressive strengths;                                              
                       (b) is essentially free of a combination of hollow and solid foam            
                                strands;                                                            
                       (c) has an essentially uniform panel thickness;                              
                       (d) fits fully within a cavity defined by cavity walls and, when             
                                in said cavity, the building panel has a compressive                
                                recovery that supplies sufficient pressure against the              
                                cavity walls to frictionally retain the building panel              
                                within the cavity, said pressure being 100 Newtons-                 
                                per-square-meter or more and 200,000 Newton-per-                    
                                square-meter or less;                                               
                 and wherein, if said panel has at least two adjacent panel domains                 
                 containing fibrous material with a fiber orientation, the fiber                    
                 orientation of one panel domain is nonorthogonal to the fiber                      
                 orientation of at least one adjacent panel domain and wherein the                  
                 panel has an edge containing a panel domain extending from a                       
                 primary face to an opposing face at that edge and wherein the panel                
                 has a primary face, a face opposing the primary face, a panel                      
                 thickness, and a slit penetrating to a depth less than the panel                   
                 thickness that traverses and severs the primary face or the face                   
                 opposing the primary face.                                                         
           Claim 22, which depends from claim 1, adds the further limitation that "the panel        
           domains extend through the thickness of the panel."                                      
                 Rejection                                                                          
                 Claim 1 and claim 22 have both been finally rejected3 as having been               
           obvious in view of:                                                                      
                 Hans Walendy et al., "Filler body as molded part for sealing poorly                
                 accessible hollow spaces", U.S. Patent 5,529,824 (issued 25 June                   
                 1996); and                                                                         
                 Edgar R. Ducharme, "Insulating insert for the cores of building                    
                 blocks", U.S. Patent 5,062,244 (issued 5 November 1991).                           
                                                                                                   
           3 Final Office Action (FOA) at 3.                                                        



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013