UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte JUNICHI MIYANO,
KIYOHIKO TOSHIKAWA, and YOSHIKAZU MOTOYAMA
______________
Appeal 2007-0496
Application 10/273,147
Technology Center 1700
_______________
Decided: October 15, 2007
_______________
Before CHUNG K. PAK, CHARLES F. WARREN, and
CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Applicants appeal to the Board from the decision of the Primary
Examiner finally rejecting claims 1 through 12 in the Office Action mailed
June 2, 2004 (Office Action). 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134(a) (2002); 37 C.F.R. §
41.31(a) (2005).
We affirm-in-part the decision of the Primary Examiner.
Claims 1 and 10 illustrate Appellants’ invention of a CVD apparatus,
and are representative of the claims on appeal:
1. A CVD apparatus comprising:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013