Appeal 2007-0511
Application 10/699,508
1 unpatentable over claims 1, 13, 19-22, and 33-35 of copending Application
2 10/699,509.
3 G. DECISION
4 The rejection of claims 1-6, 10, and 15-19 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
5 being unpatentable over the combination of Kolosov and O’Rear or Gatto is
6 affirmed.
7 The rejection of claim 9 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
8 unpatentable over the combination of Kolosov and Perez is affirmed.
9 The rejection of claims 7, 8, 20, and 21 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
10 being unpatentable over the combination of Kolosov, McFarland, and
11 O’Rear or Gatto is affirmed.
12 The rejection of claims 11-14 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
13 unpatentable over the combination of Kolosov, Smrcka, and O’Rear or Gatto
14 is affirmed.
15 The rejection of claims 22 and 23 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
16 unpatentable over the combination of Kolosov, Garr, and O’Rear or Gatto is
17 affirmed.
18 The provisional rejection of claims 1-3, 6, 11, 12, 15-18, and 21-23
19 under the judicially created doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting as
20 being unpatentable over claims 1-5, 17, 18, and 24-30 of copending
21 Application 10/779,422 is affirmed.
22 The provisional rejection of claims 1-3 and 10-14 under the judicially
23 created doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting as being unpatentable
24 over claims 20, 22-24, and 26-30 of copending Application 10/699,529 is
25 affirmed.
26
Page: Previous 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013