Ex Parte Domijan - Page 2

            Appeal 2007-0513                                                                                 
            Application 10/274,797                                                                           

        1                1.  An apparatus for double seaming an end unit to a can body,                      
        2          comprising:                                                                               
        3                       a double seaming chuck;                                                      
        4                       a first drive mechanism operably connected to said double                    
        5          seaming chuck for rotating said double seaming chuck;                                     
        6                       a double seaming roll;                                                       
        7                       means for selectively moving said double seaming roll toward                 
        8          said double seaming chuck to perform a double seaming operation; and                      
        9                       a second drive mechanism for rotating said double seaming roll               
       10          in a direction so as to reduce relative rotational speed between said double              
       11          seaming roll and a workpiece when the double seaming roll comes into                      
       12          contact with the workpiece during the double seaming operation, said second               
       13          drive mechanism being constructed and arranged to be normally disengaged,                 
       14          and to become engaged as the double seaming roll is moved toward the                      
       15          double seaming chuck to perform a double seaming operation.                               
       16                                                                                                    
       17                                                                                                    
       18                                   THE REFERENCES                                                   
       19                                                                                                    
       19 Sedwick                                   US 1,695,210                          Dec. 11, 1928      
       20                                                                                                    
       20 Currie                                       US 3,025,814                          Mar. 20, 1962   
       21                                                                                                    
       22                                                                                                    
       23                                   THE REJECTIONS                                                   
       24          The claims stand rejected as follows: claims 1, 3-5, 7, 8 and 10-12 under                 
       25   35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Sedwick, and claims 6, 13, 14 and 17-21                     
       26   under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over Sedwick in view of Currie.                                 
       27                                                                                                    
       28                                        OPINION                                                     
       29          The rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) is affirmed as to claims 1, 3, 4 and 7,            
       30   and reversed as to claims 5, 8 and 10-12.  The rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is                
       31   reversed.                                                                                        



                                                      2                                                      


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013