Appeal 2007-0601
Application 09/792,290
said group members” and “transmitting the processed feedback to the
networked devices operated by the group members” requires that the
processed feedback consist of combined feedback from two or more group
members.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Appellants invented a system, method, and computer program
product for enhancing awareness of fellow students’ state of comprehension
in an educational environment (Br 3:18-20).
2. DeNicola teaches a system and method for live interactive distance
learning. DeNicola teaches administering tests to a plurality of students
connected via networked thin client devices, scoring the tests, and providing
instantaneous test results to each student (col. 13, ll. 38-48).
3. DeNicola teaches providing each student with his or her
individualized test results (col. 14, ll. 13-16).
4. DeNicola further teaches a client level account management
system, by which a client (for example, the students’ employer) may retrieve
all students’ exam results, along with other statistics showing the students’
relative performance by region, nation, or worldwide, as well as percentile
ranking by department or division, by course, by class, and by student (col.
14, ll. 20-39).
5. Shiigi teaches an interactive messaging system where the
messaging devices are personal digital assistants, with styli, using wireless
communication (Abstract, ll. 13-19).
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013