Ex Parte Mantena et al - Page 6

            Appeal 2007-0770                                                                                  
            Application 09/752,330                                                                            

        1   (claim to a data structure per se held nonstatutory).                                             
        2          When non-functional descriptive material is recorded on some computer-                     
        3   readable medium, in a computer or on an electromagnetic carrier signal, it is not                 
        4   statutory since no requisite functionality is present to satisfy the practical                    
        5   application requirement. Merely claiming non-functional descriptive material, i.e.,               
        6   abstract ideas, stored in a computer-readable medium, in a computer, on an                        
        7   electromagnetic carrier signal does not make it statutory.  See Diamond v. Diehr,                 
        8   450 U.S. 175, 185-86, 209 USPQ 1, 7-8 (1981) (noting that the claims for an                       
        9   algorithm in Benson were unpatentable as abstract ideas because “[t]he sole                       
       10   practical application of the algorithm was in connection with the programming of a                
       11   general purpose computer.”).  Such a result would exalt form over substance. In re                
       12   Sarkar, 588 F.2d 1330, 1333, 200 USPQ 132, 137 (CCPA 1978) (“[E]ach                               
       13   invention must be evaluated as claimed; yet semantogenic considerations preclude                  
       14   a determination based solely on words appearing in the claims. In the final analysis              
       15   under 101, the claimed invention, as a whole, must be evaluated for what it is.”)                 
       16   (quoted with approval in Abele, 684 F.2d 902, 907, 214 USPQ 682, 687 (CCPA                        
       17   1982)).  See also In re Johnson, 589 F.2d 1070, 1077, 200 USPQ 199, 206 (CCPA                     
       18   1978) (“form of the claim is often an exercise in drafting”). Thus, nonstatutory                  
       19   music is not a computer component and it does not become statutory by merely                      
       20   recording it on a compact disk. Protection for this type of work is provided under                
       21   copyright law.                                                                                    
       22          When presented with a claim comprising descriptive material, an Examiner                   
       23   must determine whether the claimed nonfunctional descriptive material should be                   
       24   given patentable weight.  The Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) must consider                     
       25   all claim limitations when determining patentability of an invention over the prior               
       26   art.  In re Gulack, 703 F.2d 1381, 1385, 217 USPQ 401, 404 (Fed. Cir. 1983). The                  

                                                      6                                                       


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013