Ex Parte Mantena et al - Page 9

            Appeal 2007-0770                                                                                  
            Application 09/752,330                                                                            

        1          The Examiner contends that the rejection of the claims is proper.  The                     
        2   Examiner states that the term “real time” is relative.  Further, the Examiner states              
        3   that Lidow teaches using an electronic network to transmit and receive data and                   
        4   that any delay in Ludlow is considered real time.                                                 
        5          The contentions of Appellants raise several issues which were discussed                    
        6   above, the meaning of the term “real time” and whether the doctrine of non-                       
        7   functional descriptive material applies to computer based inventions.  Thus, the                  
        8   only further issue raised by Appellants’ contentions is whether Lidow teaches                     
        9   providing an entitled price in real time while the requestor waits.                               
       10                                                                                                     
       11                                     FINDINGS OF FACT                                                
       12                                                                                                     
       13          Lidow teaches a system where purchasers can purchase material through a                    
       14   supply chain server. Col. 3, ll. 20-30.  The purchaser provides orders based upon                 
       15   forecasted needs and can input orders for un-forecasted needs called ad-hoc orders.               
       16   Col. 7, ll. 33-54.  These orders are input using an EDI system.  Col. 9, ll. 27-31.               
       17   The system processes the orders and ships out the material ordered.   Billing,                    
       18   which communicates pricing for the order to the customer, is generated after                      
       19   receiving shipping notification indicating delivery of the products.  Col. 23, ll. 43-            
       20   62.  We do not consider this to be receiving a price in real time from when the                   
       21   request was placed.  We note that Lidow discusses consulting the contract between                 
       22   the purchaser and the supply chain manager (which determines the sales price)                     
       23   when the order is placed but communication of the price of the shipment is not                    
       24   made until billing.  We note that Lidow provides a table, in figure 19, which                     
       25   identifies information provided to the user of the system in real time, daily, weekly             
       26   and monthly.  We find that no information related to product price is provided in                 
       27   real time.  Further, we do we find that any of the real time reports are returned to              

                                                      9                                                       


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013