1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
2 for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board
3
4 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
5 ____________________
6
7 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
8 AND INTERFERENCES
9 ____________________
10
11 Ex parte THOMAS LENZ, BENNO MEYER, and GERHARD RUHNAU
12 ____________________
13
14 Appeal 2007-0782
15 Application 10/683,4531
16 Technology Center 3600
17 ____________________
18
19 Decided: May 30, 2007
20 ____________________
21
22 Before: TERRY J. OWENS, STUART S. LEVY, and ANTON W.
23 FETTING, Administrative Patent Judges.
24
25 LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge.
26
27
28 DECISION ON APPEAL
29
30 STATEMENT OF CASE
31 Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 (2002) from the final
32 rejection of claims 1-5, 7-13, and 15. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.
33 § 6(b) (2002).
1 Application filed October 10, 2003. The real party in interest is WABCO
GmbH.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013