Ex Parte Lenz et al - Page 2

                Appeal 2007-0782                                                                              
                Application 10/683,453                                                                        

           1          Appellants invented a method for controlling the brake system of a                      
           2    vehicle train.  (Specification 1).                                                            
           3          Claim 1 is representative of the invention and is reproduced as                         
           4    follows:                                                                                      
           5                 1.  A method for controlling the brake system of a vehicle train,                
           6          the vehicle train including a tractor vehicle and a trailer vehicle, a                  
           7          control device in the tractor vehicle arranged and constructed to                       
           8          initiate automatic braking of the trailer vehicle when a vehicle train                  
           9          rollover danger is presented, the method comprising the steps of                        
          10          detecting a coefficient of friction between the road on which the                       
          11          vehicle train travels and the vehicle train, determining whether the                    
          12          coefficient of friction is smaller than a predetermined minimum value                   
          13          when an anti-wheel-lock braking function is at least one of absent in                   
          14          said trailer vehicle and inoperative in said trailer vehicle, and reducing              
          15          intensity of automatic braking of the trailer vehicle utilizing the                     
          16          control device in the tractor vehicle when the coefficient of friction                  
          17          is smaller than the  predetermined minimum value.                                       
          18                                                                                                  
          19          The Examiner rejected claims 1-5, 7-13, and 15 under 35 U.S.C.                          
          20    § 103(a) (2004) as being unpatentable over Takao in view of Hunter.                           
          21          The prior art relied upon by the Examiner in rejecting the claims on                    
          22    appeal is:                                                                                    
          23          Hunter                     US 3,967,862                    Jul.   6, 1976               
          24          Takao                    JP  2001-58563A           Mar. 6, 2001                        
          25                                                                                                  
          26          Appellants contend that in combining Takao and Hunter, the                              
          27    Examiner has not established a prima facie case of obviousness (Br. 8).                       
          28    Appellants argue that in Takao, the vehicle combination is automatically                      
          29    braked when a threshold lateral acceleration is reached (i.e., when a rollover                
          30    condition is detected).  Specifically, a control device in the tractor                        
          31    automatically actuates the trailer brake intermittently to avoid wheel lock                   
          32    using a simple on/off trailer brake pressure actuation scheme, and removes                    

                                                      2                                                       

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013