Appeal 2007-0803
Application 10/197,801
cited reference of record in this application but not applied in the rejection
does illustrate this relationship of a master-slave combination of flip flops.
In summary, we have affirmed the Examiner’s rejection of all claims
on appeal under the judicially created doctrine of obviousness-type double
patenting. Likewise, based upon the weight and extent of the Examiner’s
arguments and evidence of unpatentability of the respectively rejected
claims under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103, the rejections of these claims, which
encompass all claims on appeal, are affirmed. Therefore, the decision of the
Examiner is affirmed.
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013