Ex Parte Ramsey Catan - Page 1



           1     The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                    
           2              for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                           
           3                                                                                                   
           4            UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                              
           5                                     __________                                                    
           6                                                                                                   
           7                  BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
           8                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
           9                                     __________                                                    
          10                                                                                                   
          11                      Ex parte CAROLYN RAMSEY CATAN                                                
          12                                     __________                                                    
          13                                                                                                   
          14                                 Appeal 2007-0820                                                  
          15                               Application 09/734,808                                              
          16                              Technology Center 1700                                               
          17                                     __________                                                    
          18                                                                                                   
          19                                Decided: July 3, 2007                                              
          20                                     __________                                                    
          21                                                                                                   
          22    Before MICHAEL R. FLEMING, Chief Administrative Patent Judge,                                  
          22 HUBERT C. LORIN, ALLEN R. MacDONALD, LINDA E. HORNER, and                                         
          23                                                                                                   
          23 ANTON W. FETTING, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                   
          24                                                                                                   
          25                                                                                                   
          26    PER CURIAM                                                                                     
          27                                                                                                   
          28                                                                                                   
          29                              DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
          30                                                                                                   
          31                                                                                                   
          32                           STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                   
          33                                                                                                   
          34          The appeal is from a decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 5-11                      
          35    and 13-161.  35 U.S.C. § 134 (2002).  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.                     
          36    § 6(b) (2002).                                                                                 
                                                                                                               
                1 Claims 1-4, 12, and 17 have been canceled.                                                   



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013